Program#/Poster#: 5404

Abstract Title: Early Dark Adaptation: Effect of Age

Presentation Start/End Time: Thursday, May 04, 2006, 11:15 AM -11:30 AM

Location: Palm A

Reviewing Code: 103 adaptation - VI

Author Block: K.E. Higgins1, J.M. White2, D.Cades3, V.Ciaccio2, L.Liu1. 1Arlene R Gordon Research Inst, Lighthouse International, New York, NY; 2VA NJHCS, East Orange, NJ; 3George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Keywords: 413 aging: visual performance, 412 aging

Purpose: Sturr et al. (1991) reported that older, compared to younger, subjects (Ss) evidenced a slower recovery of sensitivity during the first second after the offset of a relatively intense pre-adapting field that would have produced appreciable bleaching of cone photopigment. In contrast, we (unpublished data) did not find any age difference when recovery was measured following exposure to a relatively moderate intensity, transient (1 sec. duration), peripheral, glare source Our objective was to determine if an age-dependent delay in early dark adaptation would occur at moderate light levels if the exposure was continuous instead of transient.
Methods: Twelve young (24.8±2.7 yrs) and 10 elderly (60.9±7.5 yrs) Ss in good ocular health with VA > 20/40 participated. Ss were initially pre-adapted for 7 minutes to a 12o diameter, 150 cd/m2 white adapting field (AF) with a small, dim, central fixation light. Subsequently, AF luminance was abruptly decreased to 1 cd/m2 for a duration of 2 seconds on each trail and then returned to 150 cd/m2 for the remainder of the trial. Over a series of trials, early dark adaptation thresholds were measured at several times (from 20 - 700 msec) after the AF decrement using a 2-alternative, spatial forced choice procedure. On each trial, a 45 arcmin, 20 msec test flash was presented either above or below the central fixation light. Also, steady-state (SS) thresholds were measured following 7 minutes of continuous adaptation to AF levels of 150 and 1 cd/m2.
Results: A 2-way ANOVA showed a) the effect of age was significant, with thresholds being higher for the older Ss; b) the effect of time after AF luminance decrement was significant, with threshold decreasing with increased time in the dark for all subjects; c) the time by age interaction was also significant, indicating that recovery during early dark adaptation was significantly slower in the elderly sample.
Conclusions: Result “a” is consistent with earlier research. Result “b” is consistent with the work of Sturr et al., and, further, it suggests that our previous failure to observe an age-dependent difference in early dark adaptation, was due, at least in part, to the transient character of the pre-adapting field used in that study.

Commercial Relationship:  K.E. Higgins, None; J.M. White, None; D. Cades, None; V. Ciaccio, None; L. Liu, None.

Support: VA Grant C2833R